In a recent development, the Dongcheng District People's Court in Beijing has officially accepted a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a domestic company against Apple. The case involves Beijing Yueshi Dianhong Culture Communication Co., Ltd., the owner of the KON brand, which has taken legal action against Apple Electronic Products Trading (Beijing) Co., Ltd. for allegedly infringing on its artistic works.
According to the complaint, Apple's App Store icon in the iOS 11 operating system closely resembles the plaintiff’s artwork in terms of design, structure, and layout. KON claims that this similarity constitutes a violation of its intellectual property rights. The company is seeking an immediate halt to the sale of Apple products featuring the disputed icon, as well as a ban on any devices or systems that use the infringing design, including iOS, macOS, and other related marketing materials.
In addition to stopping the infringement, KON is requesting a public apology from Apple through national media outlets, along with compensation for economic losses incurred due to the alleged infringement. The lawsuit highlights the growing importance of protecting original creative content in the digital era, especially as tech giants like Apple continue to shape user experiences across global platforms.
KON, established in 2009, is a cross-border cultural brand known for its trendy fashion items such as clothing, accessories, and luggage. It targets young consumers who value individuality and style. The brand has been active in the cultural and fashion industries, emphasizing creativity and personal expression.
The dispute was reportedly triggered during the beta testing phase of iOS 11, when Apple updated the App Store icon. Previously, the iOS 10 version featured a triangular logo with three points, which was slightly different from KON’s design. However, the updated iOS 11 version sparked the legal action, as it appeared to be a direct copy of the plaintiff's artwork.
This case marks another instance of Apple facing intellectual property challenges in China. In 2014, Kenli Corporation accused Apple of copying the design of its mobile phone model 100C. Although the Beijing Intellectual Property Office initially ruled in favor of Kenli, the decision was later overturned by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, which concluded that Apple did not infringe on the patent.
Furthermore, in 2016, the Beijing Higher People’s Court ruled against Apple in a trademark dispute involving the “IPHONE†brand. Xintong Tiandi Technology Co., Ltd. had registered the trademark in 2007, while Apple’s iPhone was not officially available in China until 2009. As a result, Xintong Tiandi retained the trademark rights for the 18th category, marking a significant legal setback for Apple.
With the court expected to issue a ruling in the coming weeks, this case underscores the increasing scrutiny of major tech companies in China, where intellectual property protection is becoming a key concern for both local and international businesses.
Fluoroplastic High Voltage Wire
Fluoroplastic High Voltage Wire,Dc Cable,Fluoroplastic Cable,Fluoroplastic Insulated Cables
JIANGSU PENGSHEN HIGH TEMPERATURE WIRE CABLE CO., LTD. , https://www.pengshencable.com